iirc, bile acids contain cholesterol(s) and they're generally reabsorbed in the intestines, so the fiber is conjectured to bind with some before reabsorption, expelling the bound fraction of circulating cholesterol in feces.
I think y’all are so quick to try and criticize everything around the President that you’re kinda missing my point:
Of course there are people that would love to target the POTUS. The Secret Service detail exists for a reason. That reason being that yeah, it’s an unsafe job, and having them there is how we prevent a foreign adversary from just walking right into the White House and doing what we did to Maduro.
Yes this is a really simple fix. The first line if your post says it all. If they really wanted to protect children, you would put the responsibility on the services on the other end. This is about mass surveillance or disadvantaging open source solutions
You can’t embed Claude in a drone. You could tell Claude code to write a training harness to build an autonomous targeting model which you could embed in a drone.
I don't think you could find a single person working for OpenAI that couldn't find employment elsewhere within a month that pays more than enough for food and shelter. This is a ridiculous statement.
I've had no trouble with syncthing on Android. It just has access to the sync folders, as far as I can tell. Seems to work great, even if I've got the same file open simultaneously on several devices. I use a tablet in my kitchen to show my TODO at all times.
"One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong. Find which thing is not like the other by the time I finish this song!"
If anyone knows of a way to use this code on a consumer grade laptop to train on a small corpus (in less than a week), and then demonstrate inference (hallucinations are okay), please share how.
This not actually a good reason. First of all, of course you can't get anything better if you never ask for anything better or consider alternatives or put any money into anything better.
If you never invested in anything else, then the M4 Sherman tank would still be the best tank. And then you could say 'we can't get anything better' and continue to use it while refusing to ever even put 1$ into developing anything else.
And actually there are plenty of ways, even without Starship to do these things differently.
I remember when SLS fans in 2016 told me that SLS is real and Falcon Heavy is fake. Even when Falcon Heavy and now New Gleen can do most things SLS can.
One NASA Administer was almost fired for exploring if Orion could launch on Falcon Heavy.
The thing is NASA is not looking for alternatives, and it doesn't matter if Starship is fully proven and operational. People will still say its not the same, because Starship will need refuel and isn't direct.
You can always find a reason to justify one solution if you only ever consider that solution and refuse to even look at any other possibility.
Fair point on the structure, I've been using tools to help polish my English lately since it's not my first language. But the point about the 'administrative tax' in Jira/Slack is coming from my own daily frustration, not a prompt. I'd rather have an agent that actually syncs my PRs than another code assistant
I agree the wording is a bit strange, but a quick grep of the repo shows that it doesn't imply that.
The only usages of unsafe are in src/ffi, which is only compiled when the ffi feature is enabled. ffi is fundamentally unsafe ("unsafe" meaning "the compiler can't automatically verify this code won't result in undefined behavior") so using it there is reasonable, and the rest of the crate is properly free of unsafe.
I would say 27B matches with Sonnet 4.0, while 397B A17B matches with Opus 4.1. They are indeed nowhere near Sonnet 4.5, but getting 262144 context length at good speed with modest hardware is huge for local inference.
> pretend that programming is manually sanding wood, while AI-assisted programming is using a belt sander.
That analogy falls flat, because there is little creative difference between these two modes of sanding. In particular, there is approximately zero variation in what the belt sander does as a function of how you control it. It is a reliable, deterministic, very predictable tool. That’s as different from generative AI as a compiler is.
