Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the answer is precisely the realization that heliocentrism is a convenient framework for specifying the correct relationships. If one formulated their geocentrism-with-epicycles model to be precisely equivalent to heliocentrism in all physically observable details, just with Earth as the origin to their coordinate system, and acknowledged this equivalence, then that would be perfectly correct as well, albeit unduly cumbersomely framed. But the useful thing is that insight, that what happens is equivalent to the clean heliocentric model, whatever coordinates you might prefer to think of it in terms of.


Is it possible for a geocentric, epicyclic model to get the 3D positions of the solar system bodies approximately correct, as opposed to just their angular motion with respect to Earth?


I cannot edit my post any more , but I can still reply to it, and it seems the answer is yes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVuU2YCwHjw

- but you need eccentricity to get the speeds right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHmjGUxWRAI (10 minutes in.)

Furthermore, the result is not equivalent to the heliocentric model because it has many more parameters.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: