Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've thought about this a lot. Wouldn't Steve have realized this inherent contradiction? Is this an understood reality at the top levels at Apple?

That is, does Tim see his role now as maximizing revenue from the current position, with the goal being to hand off a healthier company to a "visionary" successor?

My personal answer fluctuates depending on my daily gut feeling about human nature. And how many times sourcekit crashes.



I think about this a lot too, and the question I have is – has there ever been a visionary who made his way to the top of the corporate ladder of ANY company, however enlightened? Would love to hear about it.


I think Satya Nadella, his vision has turned Microsoft around completely from a dull company to a company with vision for the future.


I think you give Satya Nadella too much credit. Steve Ballmer laid much of the ground work. Ballmer granted an interview to Bloomberg where he gave some candid answers [1].

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-04/steve-bal...


This makes me think of a sort of pendulum. Maybe what Apple needs now is to just be boring for a decade.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: