Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or why not both? The materials to make each doesn't overlap much so building on does not jack up the price of building the other.


I think if it’s governments fitting the bill, there is a limit to resources. But agree you could pursue both.

Nuclear power is still kind of fossil fuels though, so it’s just kicking the can down the road… but it’s a big kick.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: