Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah, yeah. I can see that. So what does that refer to then, the smallest size of any feature of the transistor?


It does not refer to the physical size of any element or feature of the chips.

It's the marketing department's claim about what you'd have had to do to achieve "equivalent performance" using geometries (and probably other things) that are no longer used. Or to put it another way it's completely untethered from reality in every way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: