I suspect the voting is more based on the fact that you're essentially saying "your child should give up, this field is bad and there are no good spaces for kids" when that's both terrible advice and not at all true. Yes, there are exploitative spaces, but there are in fact good spaces too. And your whole thing about how "making games is less fun than playing them and playing them is actually a dark pattern that is evil" is extremely cynical and doesn't hold well if you know about more games than mobile ones or CoD.
If the post was about a kid wanting to write novels and you had said "writing is not as fun as reading, and you shouldn't read anyways because most books are scammy self-help books and conspiracy theories that exploit your brain," I think you would be similarly downvoted. Nothing to do with a Roblox scandal in that case either.
Any rational person reading what I actually wrote would disagree with just about everything you say here.
You try to be clever twisting what was actually written, but in the end this new version is something you've written. It is what you say, not what I said. While the words are similar, they have been subtly altered to change the meanings, making them your words, not mine, and most importantly these words you've written are false.
You've twisted the words just enough so any reader skimming lightly might be confused, and misled into a consistency trap of agreement. Very subtle and skilled which only increases the loss of credibility when it is found out.
Your motivation for this begs an important question about your character, and credibility as a whole is lost.
Good people don't do this, and there can be no mistake as to whether this was intentional given the level of attention and effort you invested coupled with the clear skill that can only come from practice.
Thank you. You thoroughly make my point about how no online places being safe, as this type of subtle deceptions and behavior is what children will have to interact with and they are at a stage of development that is inherently vulnerability lacking the tools to communicate or identify the faults.
People would only call what I've written cynical, in contexts of opinion when I was talking about opinion, but I used facts and references (not the same meaning), providing rational methods of support. You would imply this is an unbacked opinion as a nullification attempt, but this doesn't work on the rational, and rationality is one of the few things that separate humanity from the animal kingdom.
You should know that these tactics and techniques you use would at one point have gotten the outcome you desired, and it may fool some of the more gullible masses for now, but that number is shrinking. The knowledge is becoming common knowledge, and when it does people like you will have nothing left.
As with all deceptions, it lacks a core consistent truth, which can't fool people all the time. The more examples you provide, the more widespread knowledge of it spreads. What you hope to keep under wraps, will eventually be known by all and then you'll be left with nothing.
Based on your objective actions, I must conclude you are a malevolent blind person desperately lost and seeking to bring destruction in its various forms to those around you for some as of yet unknown motivation towards some selfish benefit .
There is only one cure for the malady you have, and eventually someone will give you that cure since you can no longer help yourself. All I can do is pray for a swift recovery.
If the post was about a kid wanting to write novels and you had said "writing is not as fun as reading, and you shouldn't read anyways because most books are scammy self-help books and conspiracy theories that exploit your brain," I think you would be similarly downvoted. Nothing to do with a Roblox scandal in that case either.