>>>Altruistic systems don't scale (see communism).
Altruistic systems don't necessarily scale. GNU, Linux, and Apache would like to tell you that it absolutely can scale.
>>I just can't believe that you think that big budget software like say an operating system could be funded through a threshold pledge system and then distributed for free. It seems rather naive
I completely agree with you that it seems naive. I wouldn't believe it myself if I wasn't using it to send you this comment.
okay. you're missing the point. I think it was implied that I meant they don't necessarily scale. It's quite obvious that sometimes you have large altruistic projects that are successful.
Kickstarter has funded plenty of large projects.
The point is that the threshold-pledge-system isn't a viable substitute for ALL funding. Therefore getting rid of the copyright system would destroy the potential for a lot of project (like my James Bond example) because they wouldn't be able to be funded through altruistic schemes.
The burden of proof - that it is viable to substitute to the copyright with the threshold pledge system - is on its supporters
Altruistic systems don't necessarily scale. GNU, Linux, and Apache would like to tell you that it absolutely can scale.
>>I just can't believe that you think that big budget software like say an operating system could be funded through a threshold pledge system and then distributed for free. It seems rather naive
I completely agree with you that it seems naive. I wouldn't believe it myself if I wasn't using it to send you this comment.