If they want to be immortalized as a contributor to the common culture, they will have to relinquish control sooner or later.
This doesn't make sense to me. You can allow people to consume your work but not replicate it or consume it for free. The philanthropic nature of the artist is different than his creative ability.
copyright contains ownership, control, consumption, usage. It should be for the creator to determine.
This doesn't make sense to me. You can allow people to consume your work but not replicate it or consume it for free. The philanthropic nature of the artist is different than his creative ability.
copyright contains ownership, control, consumption, usage. It should be for the creator to determine.