*Note, if you actually did take it from the stackoverflow, you just infringed on...

		userbinator on July 27, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: One in every 600 websites has .git exposed Note, if you actually did take it from the stackoverflow, you just infringed on someone's copyright Does a simple access rule, which I can't see there being many sane ways to express, meet the minimum level of creativity/originality to be eligible for copyright...?

Probably not, but it depends on the court and the skill of the lawyers.